Action theory does not see sociology as scientific research like the natural sciences, handling external, independent objects; instead, sociology is clinical because it gives a sensible, meaningful description of peoples’ actions, ideas, and connections. The action theory is connected with the name of Talcott Parsons, whose concept begins with an organized evaluation of activity which sees the social actor as choosing between different methods and ends, in an atmosphere which limits selection both physically and socially. The essential social constraints on choice are norms and values. From this, Parsons accumulates a sophisticated model of the social system, such that his theory arguably sheds its voluntaristic character: that is, the idea of the choosing actor vanishes, in favor of an approach of structural determination in which norms and values play the figuring out duty. Action theory is different from conflict theory in Sociology.
Max Weber held that it was social actions that should be the emphasis of research in sociology. To Weber, a ‘social activity’ was an act accomplished by an individual to which an individual attached a meaning. For that reason, an action that an individual does not think about can not be a social activity. Eg. An unintended accident of bikes is not a social activity as they are not a result of any conscious mind. On the other hand, a woodcutter cutting timber has a motive, an objective behind that activity. It is, as a result, ‘a social action.’ Weber described two sorts of concepts: ‘Aktuelles verstehen,’ which is a straight observational understanding, and ‘erklärendes verstehen,’ where the sociologist needs to comprehend the significance of an act in regards to the objectives that have given rise to it. To accomplish this type of understanding, you need to put yourself in the individual’s shoes whose behavior you are discussing to attempt and recognize their motives.
The majority of point of view rejects the existence of a clear social structure that directs human practices. Nevertheless, those who do believe in a social system see it as being shaped by individuals.